Search Results for "disciplinary jurisdiction"

1791 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1791 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order in Gram Sabha Resolution Dispute — Procedural Irregularities in Gram Sabha Proceedings Render Resolution Invalid.

The Petitioner, Gajanan Baburao Sankpal, was the Chairman of the Pani Purvatha Ani Swachhata Samiti (Water Supply and Sanitation Committee) constitute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Challenging Dismissal of Workman and Tribunal's Order in Industrial Dispute; Outcome Not Specified

The workman, employed as an Accountant since 1995 and later promoted, was an active union member. On 25.11.2013, a strike notice under Section 22(1)(B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Employer's Writ Petition Against Labour Court Order Allowing Workman's Claim for Full Wages under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Maintainability of an Individual Workman's Application after Settlement by Other Workmen Examined.

The petitioner, Mulberry Silks Ltd, a company engaged in silk fabric manufacturing, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Industrial Court's Order Quashing Punishment for Illegal Strike. Dispute Centers on Whether Industrial Court Could Interfere with Disciplinary Action and Draw Adverse Inference from Alleged Minutes of Meeting.

These are six writ petitions filed by the Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenging the common order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim in Payment of Gratuity Act Case — Resignation Not Ground for Forfeiture. Forfeiture of gratuity under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires termination for misconduct causing damage; resignation does not justify forfeiture.

The petitioner, H. Jayarama Shetty, joined the respondent Sangli Bank Ltd. on 28 May 1991. On 3 May 1994, a show cause notice was issued regarding irr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Husband in Divorce Case Based on Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage Under Article 142 of Constitution. Marriage Dissolved as Parties Lived Apart for Almost Two Decades and Reconciliation Was Impossible, Despite Lack of Statutory Ground in Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The dispute involved a husband and wife who married in 2002 under Hindu rites, but the marriage never consummated and broke down immediately, with the...