Search Results for "contradictory statement"

1633 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1633 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as evidence of victim was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Mr. Sayyad Chand Agasapure, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i)(n) of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment in Partition Suit — Amendment Sought After Commencement of Trial Disallowed as It Would Change Nature of Suit Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC

The petitioner, Raju Danchand Bardia, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 13th October 202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eye Witness Testimony and Doubtful Recovery of Weapon. Bitter Gourd Creeper Dispute Leads to Life Imprisonment Reversed as Court Finds Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Ashok Chindha Birhade, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his neighbour Devidas, arising from a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. State fails to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt as multiple dying declarations contradict each other on material particulars.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 2nd May 2000 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Satara, in Sess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Abetment to Suicide. Conviction under Sections 498A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or instigation leading to suicide.

The case involves an appeal by five accused persons against their conviction under Sections 498A and 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubt Over Common Intention. Conviction Under Section 304(I) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Unlawful Assembly and Specific Overt Acts.

The appellants, Bhatusing Virangya Ravtale, Kailas Bhatusing Ravtale, and Vishwanath Bhatusing Ravtale, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC sustained as chain of circumstances including motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon was complete.

The appellants, Joginder Rikai Paswan (A-1) and Suraj @ Jijaji Frituram Saroj (A-2), were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Immoral Trafficking Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 373, 366A, 368, 323 IPC and Sections 3, 4 of PITA set aside as sole witness's testimony was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The appellants, accused Nos. 2 and 3, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No.865 of 2002 for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Television Production Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Reputation. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that claimant failed to prove loss of reputation due to alleged breach of contract.

The petitioners, Star India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...