Search Results for "bail jurisdiction"

2971 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2971 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Cases Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Service of notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 must be proved by the complainant; mere endorsement 'not claimed' is insufficient to establish deemed service.

The petitioner, Sahajanand Investments Pvt. Ltd., filed four criminal writ petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Section 326 IPC Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction for Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt by Dangerous Weapon Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Use of Knife.

The appellant, Polash Kartik Mandal, was convicted by the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge-1, Thane, under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Consideration of Bail and Lack of Compelling Reasons. Detenu's Release on Bail in Multiple FIRs Not Considered, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid Under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, father of the detenu Yash Vijay Sashte, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a detention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's impugned order, and made the interim protection absolute by granting anticipatory bail with conditions of cooperation with investigation and trial, and non-influence of witnesses. - Anticipatory bail granted

The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to the appellant in an excise case, overturning the High Court's refusal, primarily because the appellant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 35 Mandate for Victim Examination. The court held that failure to examine the victim within 30 days under Section 35 of the POCSO Act entitles the accused to bail under Section 439 CrPC.

The petitioner, Sri Krishna V, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in Crime No.33/2019 r...