Search Results for "Void Order"

5152 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5152 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Petition in Interest on Security Deposit Dispute. Contractual Bar on Interest and Non-Applicability of Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration Act Renders Claim Unsustainable; Arbitrator’s Finding on Evidence Upheld.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 December 1996 between the petitioner, M/s. Mascon Multiservices & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., and the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition for Return of Minor Child to Netherlands. Dutch Mother's Custody Rights Upheld; Child's Habitual Residence Determined as Netherlands.

The petitioner, a Dutch national, filed a habeas corpus petition seeking the return of her minor daughter 'N' from the respondent father and his famil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SEBI's Appeal Against Interim Order Restraining Adjudication Proceedings. Civil Suit Against SEBI Held Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy Under SEBI Act, 1992.

The case involves an appeal by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) against an interim order passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...