Search Results for "Tribunal error"

4714 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4714 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in PFA Supply Dispute, Upholds Arbitral Award. Findings of fact by arbitral tribunal are not open to reappraisal in appeal under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

The case arises from an agreement dated 4 October 2000 between Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) and Dirk India Private Limited (DIPL) for th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeals in Motor Accident Claims Case Due to Error in Multiplier and Future Prospects. Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 8,50,000 to Rs. 10,10,000 for Death of 40-Year-Old Self-Employed Person.

The present appeals arise out of a motor accident that occurred on 05.01.2012, involving a truck, a car, and a tempo. The deceased Kishorbhai Popatbha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses GSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation of Rs.24,93,000 for Leg Amputation. Negligence of ST Bus Driver Solely Responsible Despite Non-Joinder of Driver and Insurer; No Contributory Negligence by Motorcyclist.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by Babubhai Jasabhai Maru (the claimant) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Appeal by GSRTC and Cross-Objection by Claimants in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Bus Driver Upheld, Compensation of Rs.3,12,000 Affirmed. Tribunal's Assessment of Income and Multiplier Found Correct Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of Shantilal Mavjibhai Vaghela, who died in a collision between a car an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Sufficient Evidence of Vehicle Involvement. Tribunal erred in dismissing claim petition under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 despite FIR, panchnama, and eyewitness testimony establishing involvement of offending vehicle.

The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was filed by the original claimants, Simkiben Bhanabhai Rathod and another, again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Sufficient Evidence of Vehicle Involvement. Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim Petition Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Despite FIR and Panchnama Showing Involvement of Offending Vehicle.

The present appeal was filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the original claimants, Simkiben Bhanabhai Rathod and another, being...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partly Allows Appeal by Claimants in Motor Accident Claim Case — Enhances Compensation from Rs.7.71 Lakhs to Rs.12.33 Lakhs. Multiplier of 18 applied and 40% future prospects added for self-employed deceased aged 25 years under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, who are the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased, against the judgment and award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Karnataka Land Reforms Case — Testamentary Succession of Tenancy Rights Upheld. Civil Court Findings on Tenancy and Succession Are Binding on Land Tribunal Under Section 48-A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The case involves a long-standing dispute over agricultural land in Bilagi Village, Karnataka, spanning over half a century. The appellant, Kanna Timm...