Search Results for "Majority rule"

2448 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2448 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Interception Orders of Petitioner in Indian Telegraph Act Case Due to Absence of Public Emergency or Interest of Public Safety. The Court Held That Telephone Interception Without Proper Statutory Compliance Violates Right to Privacy and Intercepted Material Must Be Destroyed.

The petitioner, a businessman, challenged three orders dated 29 October 2009, 18 December 2009, and 24 February 2010, by which his telephone calls wer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suit for Pure Economic Loss Without Physical Damage — Claim for Production Loss Due to Vessel Grounding Held Not Maintainable in Tort of Negligence. Defendant Vessel Owner Not Liable as No Duty of Care Owed to Jetty Owner for Purely Economic Loss.

The plaintiff, owner of a captive jetty and PVC resin plant, filed an admiralty suit against the defendant vessel, claiming production loss of Rs. 12,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application to Stay Damages Claim in Admiralty Suit for Wrongful Arrest of Bunkers. Court Examines Argument That Suit for Interim Security Pending Arbitration Does Not Disclose Cause of Action, Reliance on BALCO Judgment.

An admiralty suit was filed by a foreign company against, inter alia, the bunkers on board the vessel M.V. African Eagle and its charterers, seeking a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Interception Orders in CBI Corruption Case for Lack of Reasons and Public Emergency. Orders under Section 5(2) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 set aside as they merely recited statutory language without recording cogent reasons demonstrating public safety or public emergency.

The petitioner, Shyamalendu Kumar Das, a Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), challenged two orders dated 9 March 2018 and 17 March 2018 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application to Reject Election Petition and Amendment Plea in 189-Karjat Assembly Election. Examination Focuses on Compliance with Material Particulars Under Section 83 and Grounds Under Section 100 of RP Act and Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The matter before the Bombay High Court concerned an election petition filed by Sudhakar Parshuram Ghare, an independent candidate from 189-Karjat Leg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5290 OF 2013

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Operational Creditor in Insolvency Case Due to Defective Demand Notice and Limitation Bar. Section 9 Application Under I&B Code Fails as Date of Default is Later Than Demand Notice and Invoices are Time-Barred.

The Appellant, M/s. Metals and Metal Electric Private Limited, an operational creditor, filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Ban...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Judicial Scrutiny of RBI's Supersession of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank's Board. Balance between Constitutional mandates and banking regulations reaffirmed.

The Bombay High Court assessed the legality of the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) supersession of the Board of Directors of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank...