Search Results for "Civil Judge (Junior Division)"

1728 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1728 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition for Production of Documents in Civil Suit — Liberal Approach Under Order 7 Rule 14 CPC. Public Documents Can Be Produced at Any Stage; Requirement of Sufficient Cause Deleted by Amendment.

The petitioner, Smt. Chitrakala Fal Dessai, was the original plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 25/98 pending before the Civil Judge Junior Division,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Trust Property Encroachment Case — Defendant Acquitted of Adverse Possession Claim. Suit for Possession by Trust Held Not Barred by Limitation as Encroachment is Continuing Wrong Under Section 23 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Namdeo Khedkar (appellant/defendant) against the judgment of the Joint District Judge, Chandrapur, which re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Order Permitting Withdrawal of Suit with Liberty to File Fresh Suit Under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC. Defects in Plaint Including Misjoinder, Non-valuation, and Improper Reliefs Held Not Formal Defects.

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by Rajaram s/o Jairam Raut (the defendant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Extension of Time to File Written Statement Beyond 90 Days in Civil Suit — Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory. Petitioner/Defendant Granted Relief as No Dilatory Tactics Were Adopted and Sufficient Cause Was Shown for Delay.

The petitioner/defendant challenged the judgment and order dated 30th June 2003 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Margao, which decl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Will and Adverse Possession. The court held that the document dated 24.10.1960 was a Will and not a settlement deed, and that the appellant failed to prove adverse possession.

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree dated 30....