Search Results for "section 23(3)"

896 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 896 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction in Cooperative Society — Petitioners Failed to Establish Title or Authorization for Construction on Society Property.

The petitioners, residents and shop owners of Bandra Ashoka Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of cert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders in Red Sanders Smuggling Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as detaining authority did not consider whether bail conditions or other measures would suffice.

The Bombay High Court allowed two habeas corpus petitions challenging preventive detention orders dated 21 February 2013 issued under Section 3(1) of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Exercise of Power. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Was Frustrated by Delayed Consideration and Failure to Supply Relevant Documents.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mavin Keezhil Mohamed Aslam, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Evidence on Income and Permanent Disability. Claimant Failed to Prove Income or Permanent Disability, Resulting in Reduction of Award from Rs.5,50,000 to Rs.1,00,000.

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 20.10.2003 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur in Claim Petition No.130/1992. The c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case - Claimants Awarded Higher Market Value and Separate Compensation for Structures and Trees. Market Value Determined at Rs. 1500 per R for Jirayat Land Based on Sale Instances Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellants, original claimants, owned land in village Kuslumb, Taluka Patoda, District Beed, which was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Cash Credit Case Under Section 68 of Income-Tax Act, 1961. Assessee Discharged Burden of Proving Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness of Creditor; Department Failed to Rebut.

The appellant, M/s. Real World Builders P Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax App...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Mining Lease Renewal Case Due to Time-Barred Application Under Rule 28 of Mines Concession Rules, 1960. Rule 28 held mandatory and intra vires; application received less than six months before lease expiry could not be entertained.

The appeal arose from a mining lease held by the appellant company, which was due to expire on March 22, 1962. Rule 28(1) of the Mines Concession Rule...