Search Results for "evidentiary value"

1129 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1129 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses. Acquittal of Nine Accused under Sections 302, 307, 147, 148 read with 149 IPC and Bombay Police Act Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Sessions Case No.113 of 2006 dated 14.05.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 354-A IPC, Section 363/511 IPC, and Section 8 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Fails to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from an incident on 26 January 2016, when the informant, a 16-year-old girl, along with her cousin sister, was walking to school for R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Forgery in Land Dispute Case. Appellant convicted under Sections 302, 201, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC for murdering landowner and forging power of attorney to transfer property.

The appellant, Tanaji Maruti Kolekar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the murder of Kasturabai Tonape and for offences of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was son of deceased and evidence suffered from material contradictions and omissions.

The appellant, Hanumantha @ Kunt Hanumantha, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge at Raichur for the murder of Basappa under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sri Manjunatha Kutta, was convicted by the Special Judge, Bengaluru Urban District, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read wit...