KAHC010159832015_1
15 Dec 2017...
Search Results for "application returned"
4559 result(s) found
Found 4559 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment in Criminal Appeal Against MPID Court's Order Rejecting Application to Declare Attachment Void. Appeal Raises Questions on Compliance with Sections 4 and 5 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999.
19 Jan 2016The criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from an order of the designated court under the Maharashtra Protection of Interests of Deposito...
- 305
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Civil Procedure Case Upholding Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The Court Held That Res Judicata Cannot Be Determined in an Order 7 Rule 11 Application as It Requires Examination of Previous Suit Records Beyond Plaint Averments Under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
9 Aug 2021The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka dismissing a revision petition against an order of the Trial Court that rejected an ap...
- 389
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application Challenging Amendment in Cheque Dishonour Case. Amendment to Add Vicarious Liability Pleadings Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Held Permissible as It Does Not Change Nature of Complaint or Cause Prejudice.
28 Apr 2023The case arises from a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by the original complainant Syed Mazaruddin (since de...
- 47
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee Upon Withdrawal of Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Court Fee Deposited at Time of Filing. The court held that the proviso to Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC mandates refund of court fee when a suit is withdrawn unconditionally, and the trial court's rejection of the refund application was erroneous.
19 Aug 2025The petitioner, Bindu Balakrishna Patali, filed a suit (Com. O.S. 150/2024) before the LXXXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Cou...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom Under Section 364A, 34 IPC. Trial Court Had Convicted Accused Based on Test Identification, Handwriting, and Call Records, Sentencing Them to Life Imprisonment.
24 Nov 2017The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard Criminal Appeal Nos. 147 of 2006 and 134 of 2006, along with Criminal Application N...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Civil Revision Applications by Tenants in Eviction Proceeding Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenants Raised Issues of Non-Decision of Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Applications, Delayed Judgment, and Misinterpretation of Section 15 of the Rent Act.
4 Aug 2015The Bombay High Court heard two Civil Revision Applications filed by tenants Vasant Mahadeo Gujar and Smt. Khatija Ismail Panhalkar against the common...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Leave India Notice and Directs Fresh Consideration of Visa Conversion Application. Non-Compliance with High Court's Orders and Lack of Personal Hearing Lead to Setting Aside of Deportation Order.
6 Sep 2013The petitioner, an Iranian national, had been residing in Pune, India, on an X visa (residence visa) which was extended up to 31 October 2011. He soug...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Challenging CIDCO Plot Allotments — Allegations of Fictitious Societies Grabbing Plots at Fixed Rates. The validity of allocations under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and CIDCO Regulations depends on the genuineness of the housing societies.
23 Nov 2005The Public Interest Litigation was instituted by Public Concern for Governance Trust, a registered charitable trust, against the State of Maharashtra,...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order Returning Plaint for Want of Jurisdiction in Contractual Dispute. Court Holds That Part of Cause of Action Arose Within Jurisdiction Where Tender Was Submitted and Bank Guarantee Was Invoked, Applying Section 20(c) CPC.
22 Jan 2015The appellant, M/s Ambarwadikar & Co., a registered firm, filed Special Civil Suit No.18/2012 before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur, seeking ...
- 78
