Search Results for "appeal scope"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "appeal scope"

8636 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8636 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — No Fault Liability Compensation Granted Despite Unlicensed Driver. Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides interim compensation on no fault basis irrespective of driver's license status.

21 Oct 2022

The appellant, Madhav Vitthal Chattekar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation of Rs.5 lakhs f...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Land Dispute Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review petition under Section 114 r/w Order 47 Rule 1 CPC dismissed as petitioners failed to establish any error apparent on the face of the record in the judgment dated 23.04.2021 in W.A. No. 898/1993.

7 Jan 2025

The case involves a review petition filed by the legal representatives of the original appellant (since deceased) against a judgment dated 23.04.2021 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Slum Declaration for Land in Mahim, Holding That Application Under Section 4(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Is Not Maintainable. The Court ruled that the power to declare an area as a slum under Section 4(1) is a suo motu power of the Competent Authority and cannot be invoked by a private application, and no appeal lies against refusal to entertain such an application.

2 Feb 2011

The petitioners, Prahlad Bansi Adsul and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the orders of the Administrator and Divisi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Condition of Deposit of 25% Compensation for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Cases. Section 148 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is procedural and applies to pending appeals; condition does not violate Article 21.

14 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Ajay Vinodchandra Shah, was convicted in three separate cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for cheque bou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application in Review Petition — Delay of 89 Days Not Sufficiently Explained, Limitation Period for Review Not Extended by Supreme Court's Liberty. The court held that pursuing a Special Leave Petition does not constitute sufficient cause for delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the liberty granted by the Supreme Court does not extend the limitation period for filing a review.

25 Apr 2019

The applicants, who were not parties to the original suit, had filed a Second Appeal (No. 21/2018) which was dismissed as not maintainable by the Bomb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Conversion of Appeal into Cross-Objection in Eviction Suit — No Limitation for Cross-Objection Under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC. The court held that a cross-objection can be filed at any time before the hearing of the appeal, even if the appeal itself is time-barred.

6 Sep 2019

The petitioners, as co-owners of the suit premises, filed an eviction suit (R.A.E. Suit No.366/543 of 2010) against the respondents (tenants) on two g...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Zilla Parishad in Reinstatement Case — Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction to Reinstate Teacher Under Section 24 of Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947. Suit Also Barred by Limitation Under Section 280 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

17 Nov 2004

The case involves a Second Appeal by the Zilla Parishad, Solapur, against a judgment of the District Court which had confirmed the Civil Court's decre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Director of Education's Order to Reinstate Head Master — Termination by Administrator Appointed Under Section 3 of Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Management) Act, 1976 Upheld as Valid. The court held that an appeal under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 is not maintainable against an order of termination passed by an Administrator appointed under the Management Act, as the Administrator is a statutory authority and not the 'management'.

22 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Madhukar Bijaramji Sawarkar, as Secretary and Chief Executive Officer of Pipla Education Society, challenged the order dated 23.4.1990...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Landlords' Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Review Maintainable for Error of Law Apparent on Record. Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 not applicable to proceedings under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

15 Sep 2015

The dispute in this writ petition arises from an eviction suit filed by the landlords (respondents) against the tenant (petitioner) under Section 16(1...

79 80 81 82 83

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)