Search Results for "Safety violation"

855 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 855 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FCRA Registration Refusal for Violation of Natural Justice. Order set aside as no hearing opportunity or reasons provided before rejecting application under Section 12(4)(vi) of FCRA, 2010.

The petitioner, Prabha Heera Pratishthan, a trust, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 18t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Land Conversion Rejection in KLR Act Case — Deputy Commissioner Directed to Reconsider Application Under Section 95 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Endorsement Without Reasons Quashed as Not a Speaking Order.

The petitioner, Sri Suhail Rehaman, claimed to be the absolute owner of agricultural land bearing Sy.No.177/5 (old No.177) measuring 0-35 ½ guntas si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Termination of Dealership for Breach of No-Other-Employment Clause. Appellant's failure to disclose employment with a private company while holding a petroleum dealership constituted a material breach of the Dealership Agreement and Marketing Discipline Guidelines.

The appellant, P. Kalyanasundaravalli, was the proprietrix of M/s K.T. Bakthavatchalam Naidu Agency, an Indian Oil Corporation dealer. She was selecte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows PIL Seeking Prevention of Cow Slaughter in Non-Designated Places During Bakrid. Court Holds That Slaughter of Cows and Calves Must Only Occur in Designated Slaughterhouses Under Article 48 of the Constitution and Tamil Nadu Animal Preservation Act.

The petitioner, K. Surya alias K. Surya Prasanth, a resident of Coimbatore and an activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Gratuity Award for Non-Seasonal Employees in Ginning Factory. Employees working as Wireman and Press Driver held entitled to gratuity at fifteen days' wages per year under Section 4(2) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, not seven days per season.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Madhaodas Jankidas Mohta Ginning and Pressing Factory (the employer) challenging orders of the Controlli...