Search Results for "Rule 12(5)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Rule 12(5)"

1708 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1708 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition for Lumpsum Maintenance in Divorce Case, Sets Aside District Judge's Order Reducing to Monthly Maintenance for Daughter. The court restored the lumpsum maintenance of ₹25,00,000 under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, holding that the husband's financial capacity and the child's welfare justified a lumpsum award.

27 Jun 2018

The petitioner, Smt. Amina Kudchadkar (alias Amina Nevrekar), filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the jud...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Tenancy Revision Case for Exceeding Revisional Jurisdiction. Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's order set aside as it reappreciated evidence without finding jurisdictional error or perversity under Section 111 of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958.

14 Sep 2018

The petitioner, a teacher, challenged the judgment of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (M.R.T.) dated 21.10.2011 in Revision Application No.TEN/B40/20...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes FIR Against Doctor in Corruption Case — No Prima Facie Case for Criminal Conspiracy or Cheating Established. Inspection Team Member's Role in Verifying Medical College Infrastructure Does Not Attract Offences Under IPC or Prevention of Corruption Act Without Evidence of Mens Rea or Pecuniary Advantage.

30 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Dr. R. Balajinathan, was arrayed as A4 in FIR No.1 of 2022 registered by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corru...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Grievous Hurt Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

11 Oct 2019

The judgment pertains to two connected criminal appeals arising from Sessions Case No.66 of 2010. The appellants, Iqbal and Arif, were convicted by th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Grievous Hurt Case Due to Inconsistent Medical Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 326 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the injury was caused by a dangerous weapon or that the accused were the perpetrators beyond reasonable doubt.

11 Oct 2019

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of the Principal Sessions Judge, Mangaluru, in Sessions Case No. 66 of 2010. The appell...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Grievous Hurt Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

11 Oct 2019

The judgment pertains to two connected criminal appeals arising from a single incident. Criminal Appeal No.876 of 2013 was filed by the accused (Iqbal...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with KIADB Act. Acquisition for Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board fails as the Board is not an industrial concern under Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

15 Dec 2016

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, challenged the preliminary notifi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Possession and Title Against Society and Transferee. The court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a suit for declaration and injunction, as the plaintiff did not produce the will or power of attorney to establish ownership or possession.

10 Mar 2015

The appellant, S. Nanjappa, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Possession and Title Against Society and Purchaser. The court held that the plaintiff cannot seek a declaration without establishing his own title, and that mere filing of a suit does not prove possession.

10 Mar 2015

The appellant, S. Nanjappa, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Private Complaint Case Against Air Force Personnel — Proceedings Quashed for Lack of Sanction Under Section 124 of the Air Force Act, 1950. Altercation Over Vehicle Use at Air Force Station Held to Be in Discharge of Official Duty, Requiring Mandatory Sanction Before Cognizance.

4 Dec 2015

The appellant, a retired Sergeant from the Indian Air Force, filed a private complaint against the 1st respondent, a serving Warrant Officer, alleging...

79 80 81 82 83

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)