Search Results for "Article 102"

1644 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1644 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Examines Fee Reimbursement Scheme Restriction for Minority Institution Students. Court Tasked with Resolving Conflicting Precedents on Whether Limiting Reimbursement to CAP-Admitted Students Is Discriminatory.

The case concerned a challenge to a Government Resolution (GR) dated 27.02.2013 issued by the State of Maharashtra, which restricted fee reimbursement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition on Removal from TPE Caution List: Alleged Violation of Natural Justice and Procedural Guidelines. Court Reserves Orders after Considering Petitioner's Grievance Regarding Inclusion in Caution List Without Proper Forum Evaluation.

The petitioner, a chartered engineer and government-approved valuer, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal on Applicability of Section 9 of Arbitration Act to Foreign-Seated Arbitration. The Appeal Concerns Interim Measures in a Contract Governed by English Law with Arbitration in London.

The dispute arose out of an agreement dated 20.10.2010 between Harmony Innovation Shipping Ltd. (appellant) and Gupta Coal India Ltd. (first responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Interception Orders of Petitioner in Indian Telegraph Act Case Due to Absence of Public Emergency or Interest of Public Safety. The Court Held That Telephone Interception Without Proper Statutory Compliance Violates Right to Privacy and Intercepted Material Must Be Destroyed.

The petitioner, a businessman, challenged three orders dated 29 October 2009, 18 December 2009, and 24 February 2010, by which his telephone calls wer...