Search Results for "seizure and recovery"

1851 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1851 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals of Accused in UAPA Terror Case, Upholding NIA Investigation and Rejecting Torture Allegations. Court holds that stringent bail conditions under Section 43D(5) of UAPA apply and that delay in raising torture claims without medical evidence is fatal.

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals filed by accused persons (Rajendra Chaudhary and Dhan Singh in Appeal No.107/2026, and Manohar Narwaria and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Credible Evidence. Dispute Over Grain Cellar Leads to Fatal Assault, but Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur dated 30 July 1997, acquitting the respondents (Gajen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Conclusive Circumstantial Evidence and Flawed Investigation. Conviction under Sections 302 and 392 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Did Not Form Complete Chain Pointing to Guilt.

The appellant, Snehal Dias, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS, Mapusa, for the murder of Naresh Dourado and robbery of his car and other items,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Wife's Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 and 201 IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances complete and consistent with guilt.

The appellant, Dashrath Dada Salunkhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malashiras for the murder of his wife Vimal @ Anita and for cau...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal of Convicted Accused in Assault Case, Dismisses State Appeals for Acquittal and Enhancement. Conviction under Section 324 r/w 34 IPC for causing simple hurt with dangerous weapon upheld, but sentence reduced to period already undergone.

The judgment arises from three appeals concerning an incident that occurred on 15th August 1999 at Loni Kalbhor, Pune. The appellants (original accuse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Step-father for Murder of Step-son Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC sustained as prosecution established motive, last seen, recovery of incriminating articles, and medical evidence.

The appellant, Sikandar alias Raju Vajir Inamdar, was convicted by the II Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of his step-son Jayku...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 147, 148, 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of the Sessions Court, Latur, convicting multiple accused persons for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Anjalappa and Ashok, were convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi in S.C. No.322/2012 for the murder of a person unde...