Search Results for "motor vehicles accident"

2386 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2386 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Court Amin in Motor Vehicle Accident - Negligence and Liability of Insurer Upheld. Multiplier of 9 applied as per Sarla Verma; conventional heads enhanced as per Pranay Sethi.

The appeal was filed by the legal representatives of the deceased M. Basavarajappa, who died in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 19.07.2007. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Tribunal's Assessment of Income and Multiplier Found Erroneous. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation with 9% interest under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, being the widow and children of the deceased Devabhai Mepabhai Bhuva, who died in a motor vehi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Deceased Engineer. Contributory Negligence Not Established; Tribunal's Assessment of Income, Multiplier, and Dependency Upheld Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) against the judgment and award dated 31-07-2006 passed by the Motor A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Rash Driving Case — Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 338, 304-A IPC Upheld. Concurrent findings of fact by courts below not interfered with as no perversity or illegality found.

The petitioner, Athaulla, was convicted by the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Gudibande in C.C.No.16/2007 for offences under Sections 279, 337, 338 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses GSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation of Rs.24,93,000 for Leg Amputation. Negligence of ST Bus Driver Solely Responsible Despite Non-Joinder of Driver and Insurer; No Contributory Negligence by Motorcyclist.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by Babubhai Jasabhai Maru (the claimant) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,...