Search Results for "interim order modification"

1249 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1249 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Transport Appellate Tribunal Order in Motor Vehicles Act Case — Lack of Jurisdiction to Review Own Orders. The Tribunal cannot review its own orders under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as no power of review is conferred by the Act or Rules.

The petitioners, who are private bus operators, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pune Municipal Corporation's Revision Against Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement. Reference Court's enhancement of compensation upheld as based on evidence and within its jurisdiction under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Pune Municipal Corporation filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Records Authority's Order Amending Consolidation Scheme After 47 Years for Being Unreasonable. Exercise of Power Under Section 31A of Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 Must Be Within Reasonable Time.

The Writ Petition was filed by agriculturists of Village Shene challenging the order dated 14.08.2008 passed by the Superintendent of Land Records, Sa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for BAPS Temple Construction — Acquisition Upheld as Valid Public Purpose Under MRTP Act, 1966. Petitioners lacked locus standi and filed petition after 10-year delay, leading to dismissal.

The petitioners, Mr. Salim Naim Khan and Mrs. Reshma Salim Khan, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of land by the State of Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of IT Rules Amendment on Fake News in Reference Opinion — Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of IT Rules, 2021 Held Not Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g) of Constitution and Section 79 of IT Act, 2000.

The present proceedings arise from a reference made under Chapter-I Rule 7 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 read with Section 98 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...