Search Results for "deed interpretation"

1632 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1632 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Defendant to Produce Documents in Cross-Examination Despite Non-Compliance with Order VIII Rule 1A(1) of CPC. Procedural Rules as Handmaid of Justice Permit Production for Limited Purpose of Confrontation When Documents Relate to Pleaded Facts and Are Not Foreign to Case.

The petition was filed by defendant no. 1 challenging the trial court's order rejecting his application to produce documents to confront plaintiff no....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Trust Dispute Under Maharashtra Trust Act. Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC Alleges Bar of Suit by Sections 22, 50, 51, 70 of Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950.

The dispute centered on the expulsion of two trustees from a trust registered under the Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950. The applicants, comprising ten in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition for Interim Injunction in Media Rights Dispute; Allegations of Fraud and Collusion Cast Doubt on Validity of Agreements. Petitioner Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case arose from a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by World Sport Group (India) Pvt. Ltd. against the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal from Order Challenging Injunction Against Builder's Construction on Redeveloped Plot. Consent of Flat Purchasers and Right to Use Additional FSI Questioned.

The matter arose from a civil suit filed by forty-three flat purchasers against the promoter/builder, M/s. Noopur Developers, seeking a permanent inju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Income Tax Case. ITSC's order under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as valid and not perverse.

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – II, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31st July 2013 passed by the Income Tax Settl...