Search Results for "contract enforcement"

1675 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1675 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Applicability of Employees' Provident Funds Act to Pigmy Agents of Cooperative Banks. Writ Petitions Filed by Both Banks and Provident Fund Authorities Challenge Tribunal Orders on Coverage of Such Agents Under Section 18(3)(d) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

A group of writ petitions came before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, filed by multiple cooperative banks and by the Assistant Provident Fund Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Appointment Despite Limitation Bar — Scope of Section 11(6A) Confined to Existence of Arbitration Agreement. The 2015 Amendment Act restricts court's role to checking arbitration agreement existence, leaving limitation and other issues to arbitrator under Section 16.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 21.12.2010 between M/s. Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited (Petitioner-Contractor) and Northern Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandamus to Enforce Lease Renewal Clause Against Central Railway. Clause 20.1 of Lease Agreement Does Not Confer Automatic Right of Renewal; Railway's Discretion to Invite Fresh Tenders Upheld.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Parcel Carriers (India) Pvt Ltd and Scorpion Express Pvt Ltd against the Union of India and Central ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Society Membership Dispute — Removal of Life Member Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Managing Committee's Decision to Expel Member Without Proper Inquiry and Opportunity of Hearing Held Invalid Under Societies Registration Act.

The appellant, Ramswaroop Sunderlal Goyal, was a life member of the respondent, North India Association, a society registered under the Societies Regi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Act Possession Notice — Bank Directed to Consider One-Time Settlement Offer. Failure to Consider OTS Proposal Before Taking Possession Violates Principles of Fairness and Natural Justice Under Section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The petitioner, Surendra Nikose, had availed a housing loan from the State Bank of India (respondent). Due to financial difficulties, he defaulted on ...