Search Results for "Bombay Civil Service Rules"

5341 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5341 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Unsigned Award Declared Invalid. An award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 must be signed by the officer; death of officer before signing renders award a nullity and land does not vest under Section 16.

The case involves a second appeal by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment of the District Court, Thane, which reversed the trial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandatory Video Recording of Court Proceedings; Court Finds No Fundamental Right to Such Recording and Leaves Policy Decision to High Court Administration.

The Bombay High Court heard two petitions together: a writ petition by Sunil Shantisarup Gupta and a criminal application by Indur Kartar Chhugani, bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging the Process of Designation of Senior Advocates Under Section 16 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Issue Concerns Whether the Existing System of Designation is Arbitrary and Violative of Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution.

Background: The case concerned a writ petition filed by a Senior Advocate challenging the prevailing system of designation of Senior Advocates in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Impounding of Document in Specific Performance Suit — No Objection Raised at Time of Exhibition. Court holds that once a document is exhibited without objection, it cannot be impounded under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 at a later stage.

The petitioner, defendant No.4 in Special Civil Suit No.167 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 24.01.2019 passed by the 8th Jo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Service Termination Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts Upheld. Employee Failed to Prove Illegal Termination; Entitled Only to Limited Monetary Claims.

The appellant, Nishikant Narayan Kale, was appointed as Planning Manager of Bajaj Tempo Limited (now Force Motors Limited) on 18 May 1980 on probation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Imported Goods in Trademark Dispute, Directs Customs to Not Withhold Clearance Based on Pending Civil Suit. Customs Authorities Cannot Refuse Clearance Solely Due to Private Trademark Dispute; Remedy Lies in Civil Court Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The petitioners, UPS Sales and Suzhou Dake Machinery Company Ltd., imported goods under Bill of Lading No. EXSH2310608. The customs authorities (respo...