Writ Petition No. 3410 of 2004
6 Oct 2017The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two writ petitions together. The petitioners, former Branch Manager and Accountant of ...
Search Results for "Article 227 writ jurisdiction"
3509 result(s) found
Found 3509 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Revenue Consolidation Scheme Matter. Minister's Orders Condoning Delay and Allowing Revision Under Section 257 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Upheld Against Challenge Under Article 227 of Constitution of India.
22 Oct 2021This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdictio...
High Court
High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Election Irregularities in Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce; Disputed Facts Require Election Petition. Court holds that Section 25 of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 does not empower the Registrar to declare elections void, and disputed election fraud allegations are beyond the scope of writ jurisdiction, requiring an election petition.
16 Nov 2022The dispute centered on elections to the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce (KFCC), a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Ac...
- 46
High Court
Gujarat High Court Quashes Collector's Order Changing Gamthal Land to Agricultural Land — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. District Collector lacked authority to convert Gamthal land tenure without notice to landowners under Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.
11 Mar 2026The writ applicants, Makhansinh Mulji Rajput and others, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the G...
- 91
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Supervisory Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Not to Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence. The Court Held That Concurrent Findings of Fact by Trial Court and Appellate Court Cannot Be Interfered With Unless Perverse or Jurisdictional Error Exists.
25 Sep 2025The petitioners, who were the plaintiffs in a suit for permanent injunction, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India chal...
- 59
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO. 7985 OF 2005.
25 Jan 2006The petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged an order of the Second Labour Court, Thane, which allowed an applicatio...
- 31
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against Reassessment Order Under Karnataka VAT Act, 2003 Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Court holds that breach of natural justice and jurisdictional error do not warrant interference under Article 226/227 when an effective alternative remedy of appeal under Section 62 of the Karnataka VAT Act, 2003 is available.
29 Jun 2016The petitioner, Pharpur Cooling Towers Ltd, filed writ petitions under Article 226/227 of the Constitution challenging a reassessment order dated 29.4...
- 112
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Whether Writ Petition Against Minister’s Order Under APMC Act Must Be Filed Before Division Bench Due to Lack of Locus Standi of Petitioners. Petitioners Challenge Amalgamation Order Passed Without Jurisdiction Under Section 43 of Maharashtra APMC Act.
4 Jan 2010The matter arose from a dispute concerning the amalgamation of Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Motala with APMC, Malkapur. Petitioners, ...
- 24
High Court
High Court of Bombay Disposes Three Criminal Applications in Matrimonial Dispute Seeking Quashing of FIRs. Accusations Involve IPC, POCSO Act, and Juvenile Justice Act Allegations Between Family Members.
3 Jul 2026The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dealt with three interconnected proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute between a husband (Prakash Hotch...
- 48
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 in Assam Accord Challenge — Majority Holds Cut-off Date of 25.03.1971 for Regularisation of Immigrants Valid. The court held that the provision is a reasonable classification under Article 14 and does not violate Articles 6, 7, 29, 325, 326, 355, 356, or 368 of the Constitution.
17 Mar 2025The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions and appeals, considered the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which was i...
- 882
