Search Results for "truck possession"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "truck possession"

179 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 179 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Registration Fee Dispute — Rule 55A of MP Motor Vehicles Rules Valid. State can charge separate fee for reserved registration numbers under Section 41(6) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

26 Aug 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court judgment that had quashed Rule 55A of the Madhya Prad...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Hotel Liability for Theft of Guest's Car from Valet Parking Under Bailment and Infra Hospitium Principles. Insurer as Subrogee Can Maintain Consumer Complaint as Co-Complainant.

14 Nov 2019

The appeal arose from a consumer complaint filed by the insurer (United India Insurance Company Ltd.) and the car owner (Respondent No. 2) against the...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased's Income as Shikshan Sewak Assessed at Rs.19,000 per Month Based on 6th Pay Commission. Compensation of Rs.44,21,000 Upheld as Just and Proper.

17 Apr 2017

The case involves an appeal filed by Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the award o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging KIADB Land Acquisition Notification — Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Title or Possession Over Disputed Land. The court held that the petitioner, a company, had no locus standi to challenge the acquisition as it was neither the owner nor in possession of the land, and the notification under Section 28(1) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 was validly issued.

26 Feb 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Nandi Engineering (Pvt) Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.

4 May 2018

The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused No.1 in NDPS Act Case for Charas Possession, Confirms Acquittal of Co-Accused for Lack of Conspiracy Evidence. Conviction under Section 20(b) NDPS Act sustained based on recovery of 46 cartons of charas concealed in leather jackets, while acquittal under Section 29 upheld due to absence of proof of conspiracy.

9 Mar 2011

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Special Judge under the NDPS Act in Special Case Nos.363 of 1998 and 279 of 1999. ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case for Possession of Commercial Quantities of LSD and MDMA. The court held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, rejecting challenges based on the complainant being the investigating officer and non-compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act.

24 Sep 2020

The appellant, Allan Bainbridge, was convicted by the learned NDPS Court at Mapusa in Special Criminal Case (NDPS) No.38/2014 for the offence punishab...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Owners in TDR Dispute — Upholds Godrej & Boyce I and Holds 2016 Amendment Prospective. The Court ruled that the right to 100% TDR for constructing amenities vests upon surrender and development, and the 2016 amendment to Regulation 34 of DCR, 1991 cannot operate retrospectively to defeat that right.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from three judgments of the Bombay High Court concerning the entitlement of owners/l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Deceased's Income Assessed at Rs. 4,500 per Month with 40% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 16 Applied Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court held that the Tribunal's assessment of income at Rs. 3,000 per month was low and that future prospects, appropriate multiplier, and conventional heads must be granted as per settled law.

30 Nov -0001

The appellants, being the widow and minor children of Shaikh Yousuf (deceased), filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 19...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court Examines the Tribunal's Award on Issues of Negligence and Quantum of Compensation.

4 Mar 2025

...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)