High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Public Interest Litigation Regarding Unspecified Government Action. The Case Involves Impleaded Respondents Including State Officials and Karnataka Public Service Commission.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "take down"
15898 result(s) found
Found 15898 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Dispute Case — Holds Magistrate Can Order Further Investigation Post-Cognizance Under Section 173(8) CrPC. The Court clarified that the power to order further investigation is not extinguished by filing of charge-sheet or taking of cognizance, and can be exercised before commencement of trial.
16 Oct 2019The case arises from an FIR lodged on 22.12.2009 by Nitinbhai Mangubhai Patel, Power-of-Attorney holder of Ramanbhai Bhagubhai Patel and Shankarbhai B...
- 235
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Addresses Requirement of Leave Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 and Applicability of IBC Moratorium in Admiralty Proceedings. Court Considers Whether Admiralty Suits Are Affected by Company Liquidation Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 and Moratorium Under Section 14 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in Light of Competing Claims of Maritime Creditors and Operation of Insolvency Law.
19 May 2020The proceedings arose from multiple admiralty suits filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, wherein orders of arrest of defendant vessels...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Restores POCSO and IT Act Charges in Child Pornography Case — High Court Erred in Quashing Chargesheet Without Considering Presumption of Culpable Mental State. Possession of Child Pornographic Material, Even Without Intent to Distribute, Constitutes an Offence Under Section 15(1) of POCSO and Section 67B of IT Act.
23 Sep 2024The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Just Rights for Children Alliance and another child rights organization against the judgment of the Mad...
- 1311
High Court
Bombay High Court Division Bench Answers Referred Questions on Adequacy of Protection Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act and Grant of Interim Injunctions. The Court Examined Whether Section 52 TP Act Provides Sufficient Safeguard to Deny Injunction Pendente Lite and the Role of Notice Registration Under Section 18 of the Indian Registration Act.
4 Oct 2016The appeal arose from an order of the Trial Court rejecting the appellant's application for temporary injunction in a suit for specific performance of...
- 36
High Court
SECOND APPEAL NO. 148 OF 2016
21 Dec 2016The dispute centered on rights to perform pooja and collect offerings at Goddess Shree Rupa Bhavani Temple in Solapur, registered as a public trust. T...
- 44
High Court
High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Enforcement of Sub-Divisional Magistrate's Order to Remove Unauthorised Parking and Obstructions on Public Road. Court Directs Police and Municipal Authorities to Take Immediate Action under Applicable Laws Including Motor Vehicles Act, Bombay Police Act, and Municipal Act, Emphasizing Public Interest and Fundamental Rights.
7 Jun 2006The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by three residents of Chandrapur, including an advocate and a cardiologist,...
- 41
High Court
- 10
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Under Section 302/149 IPC. Common Object to Forcible Possession Extended to Meeting All Eventualities Including Death, and Knowledge of Lethal Weapon by Assembly Members is Implied from Conduct.
18 Dec 1958The case arose from an incident where five individuals, including the appellants, went to take forcible possession of a field cultivatorily possessed ...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors — Personal Guarantee Not a 'Right or Interest in Property' Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Guarantors Cannot Challenge Possession Notice Before Debt Recovery Tribunal Under SARFAESI; Remedy Lies Under RDDB Act, 1993.
10 Mar 2017The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mahindra Chandrasen and Sharad Chandrasen (petitioners) against Union Bank of India and other respon...
- 79
