Search Results for "symbolic possession"

232 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes E-Auction Notice and Sale Certificate in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Violation of Rule 8(6) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. Failure to Serve 30-Day Notice Before Auction Renders Sale Void.

The petitioners, Sri T.S. Nataraj, Sri Harsha N., and Smt. N. Seema, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Writ Petition in Eviction Suit — Reverses Appellate Court's Dismissal for Non-Prosecution. Landlord's Bonafide Need for Suit Block Established; Tenant's Irregular Rent Payment Proved.

The petitioner, Abdul Gani, was the plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 195/2013 seeking eviction of the respondent-tenant, Dilip Gopaldas Duwani, fro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Will Dispute, Upholds 1935 Will Over 1988 Will. Succession rights determined by earlier valid Will; later Will found illegal and not binding on plaintiffs.

The case involves a property dispute over premises situated at CTS No.212, Nana Peth, Pune. The respondents (original plaintiffs) filed Special Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Challenge to MHADA Acquisition of Cessed Buildings for Redevelopment. Tenants Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Acquisition and Tender Process Under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

The petitioners, tenants of Dattatraya Buildings in Mumbai, filed writ petitions challenging the acquisition of the buildings by the Maharashtra Housi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantor's Property — Maintains That Guarantor Is a 'Borrower' Under Section 2(1)(f) of SARFAESI Act and That Writ Jurisdiction Is Not Available When Alternative Statutory Remedy Exists Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act.

The petitioner, Mr. Latif Yusuf Manikkoth, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the possession notice issued by the Bank of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment in Criminal Appeal Against MPID Court's Order Rejecting Application to Declare Attachment Void. Appeal Raises Questions on Compliance with Sections 4 and 5 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999.

The criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from an order of the designated court under the Maharashtra Protection of Interests of Deposito...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank of Baroda's Petition to Quash Sales Tax Attachment Over Secured Assets, Holding SARFAESI Act Priority Over State Dues. Secured Creditor's Claim Under Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Overrides Crown Debt Under MVAT Act, Attachment Without Notice Invalid.

The Bank of Baroda, a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act, had sanctioned credit facilities to M/s. Gajanan India Chemco between September 2009 an...