Search Results for "summoning Magistrate"

396 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 396 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Section 319 CrPC Case, Setting Aside High Court's Remand Order. Trial Court's Dismissal of Summoning Application Upheld as Evidence Was Insufficient to Meet the Stringent Threshold for Exercising Discretionary Power Under Section 319 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The appeal challenged the Allahabad High Court's order dated 16.05.2017 which had quashed the Trial Court's order dated 15.03.2017 and remanded the ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Summoning Order in PMLA Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Special Court in Ghaziabad Lacked Jurisdiction as Money-Laundering Offence Allegedly Committed in Maharashtra, Under Section 44(1) of Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging a summoning order issued by the Special Judge, Anti-C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Summoning of Appellants Under Section 319 CrPC in Dowry Death Case — Dying Declaration Only Named One Accused, General Allegations Insufficient. No Prima Facie Case for Section 302 IPC or Dowry Offences Against Appellants.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals against the order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad which had affirmed the trial court's order summon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement Between Spouses — Section 498A IPC Proceedings Terminated as Complainant and Accused Husband Resolved Differences and Were Living Together.

The petitioners, Yogesh Desai, Raghavendra Desai, Vinayak Desai, and Smt. Banashankri bai @ Geeta, were arraigned as accused in C.C. No.57/2015 on the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Court holds that the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is committed at the place where the cheque is presented and dishonoured, not where the cheque is drawn or the notice is served.

The petitioner, Jagdish Khodke, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of Criminal Case No. 15...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Suo Motu Reference on Summoning Advocates During Investigation; Examines Scope of Advocate-Client Privilege and Need for Guidelines to Prevent Coercive Summons. Court Addresses Legality of Direct Summons to Lawyers Under Section 179 BNSS and Absence of Judicial Oversight.

The Supreme Court initiated suo motu proceedings following a reference from a two-judge bench in a Special Leave Petition challenging a notice issued ...