Search Results for "subsequent divorce decree"

222 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 222 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Divorce Decree on Ground of Cruelty Under Hindu Marriage Act — Husband's Failure to Repay Loan and False Allegations of Adultery Constitute Mental Cruelty

The case involves a husband's appeal against a Family Court decree granting divorce to his wife on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Matrimonial Dispute Following Foreign Divorce Decree — Abuse of Process of Law. Consent of Informant and Foreign Divorce Decree Lead to Quashing of FIR Under Sections 498-A, 406, 506 IPC.

The applicants, Rahul Vishwas Mahajan, his parents Vishwas Ramdas Mahajan and Vaishali Vishwas Mahajan, filed an application under Section 482 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Wife's Appeal in Maintenance Case: Decree for Restitution of Conjugal Rights Does Not Automatically Bar Maintenance Under Section 125(4) CrPC. Wife's Refusal to Return to Matrimonial Home Must Be Based on 'Reasonable Excuse' and Burden on Husband to Prove Wilful Neglect.

The appellant, Rina Kumari (wife), and respondent No. 1, Dinesh Kumar Mahto (husband), were married on 01.05.2014 and separated in August 2015. The hu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Divorce Appeal in Mental Disorder Case, Upholds Wife's Restitution of Conjugal Rights. Allegations of Schizophrenia and Paranoid Personality Disorder Not Proved Under Section 13(1)(iii) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The case involves two appeals filed by the husband, Gajendra Mohite, against a common judgment of the Family Court at Aurangabad. The marriage between...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal for Return of Stridhan Under Section 27 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Husband Liable for Ornaments and Articles. The court held that the husband is presumed to be in possession of the wife's stridhan and must return it unless he proves otherwise.

The appellant wife, Sangeeta B. Kadam, filed a Family Court Appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 11th June 2001 passed by the Family Court ...