Search Results for "stolen property"

468 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 468 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Applicants in Kidnapping and Theft Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Mere Presence Without Overt Act or Common Intention Does Not Sustain Charges Under Sections 363, 380, 34 IPC.

The applicants, Manikrao Kale, Meher Kale, and Manish Muley, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Interim Custody of Vehicle in NDPS Case — Owner Not Implicated, Vehicle Not Used for Conveyance of Contraband. Lorry owner's application for interim custody allowed as vehicle was hired for lawful transport and owner was not an accused, with no evidence of owner's complicity.

The appellant, Denash, is the owner of a lorry bearing registration number TN 52 Q 0315 (Ashok Leyland, 14 wheeler). The vehicle was lawfully hired fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction in Robbery Case: Offence of Robbery Under Section 390 IPC Not Made Out as No Grievous Hurt Caused or Attempted. The court held that for theft to become robbery, the offender must cause or attempt to cause death or grievous hurt, and mere tying up does not suffice.

The appellant, Dudhnath @ Ajay Baburam Harijan, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Bombay, for offences under Sections 394, 450...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Theft Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. The court held that the chain of circumstances, including last seen together and recovery of stolen property, was sufficient to sustain conviction under Sections 302 and 379 IPC.

The appellant, Dilip Karbhari Govind, was convicted by the learned Ad-Hoc Additional Judge-2, Niphad, in Sessions Case No.42 of 2005 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Theft. Conviction under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove dishonest abstraction of energy beyond reasonable doubt.

The present appeal arises from the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, in Special Case (Elec.) No.11 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Alleging Illegal Demolition of Dwelling House and Seeking Compensation Under KMC Act, 1976. Allegations Include Backdating of Notices, Lack of Opportunity, and Collusion Between BBMP Officials and Private Respondent.

Background: The petitioner, a central government employee, purchased a residential property in Doddanekundi, Bengaluru, in 2005 from Dr. Suryakumar Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Conviction in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. The court held that the testimony of a single witness (PW8) without corroboration and unreliable identification cannot sustain a conviction under Section 395 IPC.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay, in Sessions Case No.1505/99. The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Hotel Liability for Theft of Guest's Car from Valet Parking Under Bailment and Infra Hospitium Principles. Insurer as Subrogee Can File Consumer Complaint Jointly with Assured.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing the hotel's appeal against an order of the State Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused No. 3 for Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Gold Bars in Bank Fraud Case. Court holds that possession of stolen property soon after theft, coupled with lack of explanation, is sufficient for conviction under Section 411 IPC.

The case pertains to a large-scale bank fraud involving forged Telegraphic Transfers (TTs) amounting to Rs. 6,70,00,000/- at Vijaya Bank, Nasik Branch...