INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1767 OF 2020
3 Nov 2025...
Search Results for "specific pleading"
1703 result(s) found
Found 1703 result(s)
High Court
High Court Dismisses Election Petition Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for Insufficient Pleadings. Petition Failed to Plead Material Facts on Alleged Corrupt Practice and Non-Compliance Under Sections 100(1)(b) and 100(1)(d)(iv) of Representation of the People Act, 1951, Leading to Lack of Cause of Action.
7 Mar 2026The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard an Election Petition filed by the losing candidate challenging the election victory of the returned candi...
- 515
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Plaintiff's Claim of Bonafide Purchase Fails as Prior Decree in O.S.No.34 of 1984 Was Binding and Sale Deeds Were Executed During Pendency of Litigation.
17 Mar 2026The appellant, H.Prema Devakumari, was the unsuccessful plaintiff in a suit for declaration and injunction. She claimed to have purchased plot No.9 fr...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Permission to File Written Statement Beyond Limitation in Specific Performance Suit. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory; Legal Representatives of Deceased Defendant Allowed to File Written Statement as No Prejudice Caused to Plaintiff.
18 Nov 2019The petitioner, Subhash Dhanraj Sankla, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a property owned by Rhoda Phiroze Noble. The ori...
- 115
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Pre-emption Suit Under Portuguese Civil Code — Right of Co-owner to Purchase Share Not Extinguished by Sale to Third Party. The court held that at the pre-trial stage, amendments to pleadings should be liberally allowed to determine the real controversy, and the trial court erred in dismissing the application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.
7 Feb 2025The petitioners, as co-owners of a suit property, filed a suit for declaration, specific performance, and injunction against the respondents, who are ...
- 488
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved, Limitation Barred Suit. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and payment of earnest money; suit filed beyond three years from date of refusal.
29 Apr 2025The present Regular First Appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 03.08.2022 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Dharwad, in O....
- 48
High Court
- 22
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Compliance with Section 83 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 — Failure to Disclose Material Facts and Proper Verification Renders Petition Liable for Summary Dismissal.
18 Dec 2018The petitioner, Kishor Uttamrao Gajbhiye, filed an election petition under Section 80 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, challenging the e...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court examines application for rejection of election petition alleging improper acceptance of nomination due to non-disclosure of criminal cases. Application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC raises issues of absence of material facts on material effect on election result and improper verification of petition.
19 Aug 2015The matter arose from an election petition filed by Satish Mahadeorao Uke challenging the election of Devendra Gangadhar Fadnavis, the returned candid...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal; Upholds Finding that Suit for Specific Performance Is Barred by Limitation. Court Rules Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.
18 Jul 2018The case arose from an agreement dated 6.10.1997 between the appellant, Rajesh Dayaldas Narwani, and the respondent, Kanayalal D. Bablani, whereby the...
- 23
