Search Results for "section 34"

603 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 603 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. Court sets aside award for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider counterclaims.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising out of the same arbitral award. The petitioners (original respondents) challenged the award un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages in Construction Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Finding of Delay and Quantification of Liquidated Damages Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s B.E. Billimoria & Co. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging part of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's findings on fraud, jurisdiction, and liability, rejecting allegations of perversity and violation of natural justice.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Avitel Post Studioz Ltd. and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Upholds Rejection of Price Escalation and Interest Claims. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contract Clause 70C and Discretion on Quantum Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, a consortium of M/s. Valecha Engineering Limited and M/s. AMA Private Limited, entered into a contract with the respondent, Airports A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Service Tax Reimbursement Dispute. Contractual interpretation of service tax liability under security services contract upheld by arbitrator.

The petitioner, Bombay Intelligence Security (India) Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Service Tax Reimbursement. Contractor not entitled to reimbursement of service tax imposed after bid submission but before contract award where contract provided for reimbursement only if tax was payable on date of bid.

The petitioner, Punj Lloyd Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated ...