Search Results for "section 22A"

149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction on Municipal School Land — No Violation Found in Grant of IOD and Occupation Certificate. Court held that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the construction or deviation from sanctioned plans, and the PIL was dismissed with costs.

The petitioner, Sanjay Krishna Chavan, claiming to be an RTI activist and social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Reservation Condition in Development Permission Dispute. MHADA Housing Reservation Deleted by Sanctioned Modification to Development Plan, Municipal Corporation Cannot Insist on Compliance.

The petitioner, Cosmos Constructions, a partnership firm, owned land at Chitalsar, Manpada, Thane. The Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC) imposed Condi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Shifting of Liquor Shop Between Regions in Union Territory of Puducherry. The term 'place' in Rule 209 of the Puducherry Excise Rules, 1970 is not restricted to a particular region but permits shifting within the entire Union Territory.

The appellant, M/s Cee Cee & Cee Cee's, held an F.L. 1 License under the Puducherry Excise Act, 1970 for wholesale vending of Indian Made Foreign Liqu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Manager in Cheating Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Complaint under Sections 406, 409, 420, 468, 471, 120B, 34 IPC Quashed as Abuse of Process Under Section 482 CrPC.

The applicant, Dinesh Kashiram Mange, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Bombay High Co...