Search Results for "search and seizure before FIR"

538 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 538 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Recovery of 100 grams smack fails as prosecution did not prove samples were drawn from entire contraband and seals were not properly affixed, violating Sections 8 and 21 of NDPS Act.

The appellant, was convicted by the Trial Court under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Accused in UAPA and BNS Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 13 of UAPA — Failure to Obtain Prior Approval from Central Government Renders Investigation Invalid

The case involves two criminal petitions filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking quashing of FIR in Cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Delay in Trial. Personal Search of Accused Conducted Without Informing Right to Search Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, Violating Mandatory Safeguard Under Section 50 of NDPS Act.

The applicant, Arshad Karar Khan, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking regular ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Adjudicates Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Ganja Possession Under Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act. Appeal Challenges the Trial Court's Judgment Sentencing the Accused to Three Years Rigorous Imprisonment and Fine.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Special Judge (NDPS Court), Nagpur, in NDPS Special Case No. 24 of 2017, whereby the appellant was convicted f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Accused's Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 Read with Section 34 IPC Rejected as Chain of Circumstances Establishes Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

Two criminal appeals were filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the conviction and sentence recorded by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction for Rape and Murder. Appeal Challenges Conviction Under Sections 376 and 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence.

The appeal arises from the judgment of conviction dated 08.11.2017 by the VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, in Ses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Prasada Sudhakar Kulkarni, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of the victim. The prose...