Search Results for "sale tax incentives"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "sale tax incentives"

82 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 82 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Excise License Renewal Case — State Cannot Deny Renewal Without Proper Notice and Hearing. Renewal of FL-3 license under Maharashtra Foreign Liquor Rules cannot be refused on grounds of pending criminal proceedings without affording opportunity of hearing.

22 Jun 2026

The petitioner, John Distilleries Private Limited (formerly John Distilleries Ltd.), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, with its ma...

High Court

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3301 OF 2018

9 Apr 2025

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part and Refers Question of Law to Larger Bench in MSMED Act Dispute. Registration Under Section 8 of MSMED Act, 2006 Not a Precondition for Reference Under Section 18, but Issue Requires Authoritative Determination by Three-Judge Bench.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by NBCC (India) Ltd. against the State of West Bengal and others, concerning a dispute with M/s Saket Infra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Liability for Supplementary Award Rests with Original Beneficiary, Not Transferee Company. Scheme of Arrangement Under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956 Does Not Transfer Contingent Liabilities of Pending Acquisition Proceedings.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd. against the order of the Himachal Pradesh High Court dated 12.07.2022. The Hi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Sections 212(6) and 217 of Companies Act, 2013 and Cognizance Order. Petitioners sought declaration that sections unconstitutional and quashing of arrest warrants issued by the Special Court in SFIO complaint.

15 Apr 2024

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Section 29A(h) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Regarding Guarantor Eligibility. The court held that a person who has executed an enforceable guarantee is not disqualified from submitting a resolution plan unless the guarantee has been invoked, as liability crystallizes upon invocation under the amended provisions.

18 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court was called upon to interpret Section 29A(h) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as amended, concerning the eligibility of a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reviews Challenge to CCI Investigation Order in Online Marketplaces Case — Petitioners Contend Lack of Prima Facie Opinion and Appreciable Adverse Effect on Competition Under Section 26(1) of Competition Act, 2002.

11 Jun 2021

The dispute involves writ petitions filed by Amazon Seller Services Private Limited and Flipkart Internet Private Limited, challenging an order dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Benefit of Government Order Dated 29th August, 2020 for Stamp Duty Concession in Addition to ITP Regulation Concession. The Court held that the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 is a separate and independent concession and the Petitioners are entitled to avail both concessions under the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966.

22 Feb 2021

The Petitioners, Macrotech Developers Ltd. and Palava Dwellers Private Ltd., are companies engaged in real estate development. They filed a Writ Petit...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Circulars Denying SEZ Benefits to Trading Units — Circulars Held Ultra Vires Foreign Trade Policy. Court rules that Paragraph 6.11 of Foreign Trade Policy does not restrict SEZ benefits to only manufacturing units, and trading units are entitled to duty-free import of goods for re-export.

3 Aug 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Wipro GE Healthcare Private Limited, a trading unit operating within a Special Economic Zone (SEZ), filed writ petitions under Ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Challenge to Pledge of Shares During Lock-In Period — Pledge Held Valid as Lock-In Restricts Transfer of Title, Not Interest. Court Rules That Pledge Under Section 172 of Contract Act Does Not Violate SEBI ICDR Regulations, 2009.

5 Nov 2014

The plaintiff, Kannan Vishwanath, a promoter and managing director of Dr. Datson Labs Limited, filed a suit and notice of motion seeking a declaration...

6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)