Search Results for "retirement recovery"

474 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 474 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice Issued on Retirement Day for Non-Submission of Caste Validity Certificate. Departmental Action Initiated After Superannuation Without Pending Proceedings or Pension Disallowance Is Barred by Service Rules.

The petitioner, Narendra K. Kumbhare, was employed with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. from 24.04.1985 as a Typist and was promoted over the years, u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Pension Claim of Removed Teacher Under Rule 101 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Distinction Between Removal and Dismissal Determines Eligibility for Compassionate Pension.

The petitioner, Nalini Shende, was appointed as a temporary teacher at Smt. Jankidevi Jaiswal Prathmik Vidyalaya, Nagpur, and was granted permanency f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pensioner's Claim for Balance Gratuity Under VIIth Pay Commission Ceiling. Petitioner restricted claim to Rs.20 lakh ceiling, already paid Rs.9,76,280, balance Rs.10,23,720 directed to be paid with interest.

The petitioner, Dr. Mohammad Modassir, a pensioner and former State Election Commissioner of Goa, filed a writ petition seeking payment of retirement ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Salary from Retired Head Teacher Due to Delay and Lack of Misrepresentation. Recovery of overpayment made to a retired employee after a lapse of 4 years 11 months from retirement is unsustainable in law.

The petitioner, Donald Daniel Ferreira, was initially appointed as a Teacher in respondent no.9 school on 1 August 1990 and later appointed as Head Te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...