Search Results for "reopening notice"

599 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 599 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Prior Recording of Reasons. Reopening under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Reasons Not Recorded Before Issuance of Notice.

The petitioner, M/s. Indusind Media & Communications Ltd., filed its return of income for assessment year 2007-08, which was revised and subsequently ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Provision for Unascertained Liabilities is Invalid.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016, declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Based on Change of Opinion Not Permissible; Notice Under Section 148 Quashed.

The petitioner, Hasmukh Estates Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956/2013, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, Zuari Foods and Farms Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2011-12 declaring nil income after claiming exemption ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia) is Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. NDT Systems, a partnership firm engaged in non-destructive testing business, filed its return of income for assessment year 2007-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material Beyond Four Years. Reopening Based on Change of Opinion Regarding Melting Loss Percentage Not Valid as Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) Had Examined the Issue.

The petitioner, Sound Casting Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking to reopen its assessment for Assess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reopening Case — Reopening Invalid Due to Change of Opinion. Tribunal's finding that reassessment notice was based on mere change of opinion upheld under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case pertains to an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held that the reopening of assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment in Income Tax Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Original Assessment Was Based on Full Disclosure and Scrutiny.

The petitioner, Multiscreen Media Private Limited, is engaged in the business of providing audiovisual television content, films, events, and related ...