Search Results for "recovery after superannuation"

262 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 262 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows Railway's Petition in Pay Revision and Recovery Case — Recovery from Retired Employee Quashed as Unjust. Pay Revision Upheld but Recovery from Retiree After Ten Years of Erroneous Pay Fixation Held Impermissible.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager, Southern Railway, challenging an order of the Centr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Pension Claim of Removed Teacher Under Rule 101 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Distinction Between Removal and Dismissal Determines Eligibility for Compassionate Pension.

The petitioner, Nalini Shende, was appointed as a temporary teacher at Smt. Jankidevi Jaiswal Prathmik Vidyalaya, Nagpur, and was granted permanency f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Bank to Unblock Family Pension Account of Widow Due to Absence of Fault and Violation of Natural Justice. Recovery of excess pension cannot be unilateral and must follow due process of law; blocking of entire account without notice causes hardship to pensioner.

The petitioner, a 62-year-old widow, received family pension following the death of her husband, a Second Division Assistant who died in harness in 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Pay Fixation Dispute — No Misrepresentation by Employee. Recovery of Rs.3,46,931/- from pension set aside as order passed without notice and employee not responsible for pay fixation error.

The petitioner, Rangrao s/o Mersing Jadhav, was appointed as a Peon on 08.11.1983 and superannuated on 31.08.2017 as Junior Administrative Officer (Su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 957 OF 2013

The petitioners, retired employees of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation, along with other slum dwellers, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Lecturer in Career Advancement Scheme Case. Recovery of Excess Payment Without Fault of Employee Held Unjust Under Government Resolution Dated 27.02.1989.

The petitioner, Mrs. Z.H. Lamak, a retired Lecturer, challenged an order dated 31.07.1996 directing recovery of Rs.1,04,989/- from her terminal/retira...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Employee in Coal India Service Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as No Inquiry Held Before Dismissal Based on Self-Declaration. Rule 34(1)(ii) of Coal India Executives Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1978 Requires Inquiry Before Penalty of Removal.

The petitioner, Shri Sheopurari Singh, was employed as Deputy General Manager (Vigilance) in M-1 Grade at the Vigilance Department of Western Coalfiel...