Search Results for "ransom demand"

115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as sole reliance on interested witnesses and failure to conduct Test Identification Parade rendered identification doubtful.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, convicting the appellant (original accused No.3) under Section 364...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Forgery in Land Dispute Case. Appellant convicted under Sections 302, 201, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC for murdering landowner and forging power of attorney to transfer property.

The appellant, Tanaji Maruti Kolekar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the murder of Kasturabai Tonape and for offences of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances.

The appellant, Bhagwat Putalaya Pawar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur for the murder of his wife Parvati under Section 302 IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping Under Section 363 IPC in Child Abduction Case. Court Confirms that Taking a Minor Without Consent of Guardian Constitutes Kidnapping, Rejecting Defense of Consent by Child's Mother.

The appellant, Salman Sufiyan Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Borivali Division, Dindoshi, Mumbai, in Sessions Case No.138 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal Seeking Injunction Against Demolition — Tenant Refusing to Vacate Despite Offer of Market Compensation. Court Held That Tenant Cannot Hold Development to Ransom and Must Accept Compensation or Face Eviction.

The appellant, Smt. Esther Manickam, was a tenant in Flat No.A2, Ground floor, Ruia Building, Juhu, Mumbai, paying rent less than Rs.50 per month. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Life Imprisonment Confirmed Based on Credible Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Common Intention Established Under Section 34 IPC for Fatal Assault During Altercation.

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals filed by three accused persons convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Rajes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Kidnapping and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 364, 387, 201 read with 120B IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances was complete and motive established.

The appellant, Raju @ Doctor Vyankatswami, along with co-accused Somnath, Rufas, Yogesh, and Naresh, was tried for offences under Sections 120-B, 364,...