Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping Under Section 363 IPC in Child Abduction Case. Court Confirms that Taking a Minor Without Consent of Guardian Constitutes Kidnapping, Rejecting Defense of Consent by Child's Mother.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 66
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Salman Sufiyan Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Borivali Division, Dindoshi, Mumbai, in Sessions Case No.138 of 2011 for an offence under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to 5 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.20,000. The case arose from the kidnapping of a 3.5-year-old boy named Sufiyan, son of complainant Anwar Khan Abdul Wahid Khan. On 20 April 2011, the complainant reported his son missing. Subsequently, the mother-in-law received phone calls from an unknown person claiming the child was in his custody and threatening dire consequences. The police registered FIR No.148 of 2011 under Sections 363, 364-A, 341, 342 read with Section 34 IPC. During investigation, the police traced the appellant and the child was recovered. The trial court acquitted the appellant of charges under Sections 364-A and 342 IPC but convicted him under Section 363 IPC. The appellant appealed against the conviction. The High Court examined the evidence, including testimony of the complainant and police witnesses. The court found that the prosecution established that the appellant took the child without the consent of the lawful guardian. The appellant's defense that the child's mother had consented was not supported by credible evidence. The High Court upheld the conviction and sentence, dismissing the appeal.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Kidnapping - Section 363 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Taking of minor without consent of lawful guardian - The appellant was convicted for kidnapping a child aged 3.5 years. The court held that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant took the child from the custody of the lawful guardian without consent. The defense that the mother consented was not substantiated. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code for kidnapping a minor child is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence under Section 363 IPC are upheld.

Law Points

  • Kidnapping
  • Section 363 IPC
  • Consent of guardian
  • Minor child
  • Abduction
  • Criminal appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (06) 60

Criminal Appeal No. 864 of 2012

2014-06-09

A.S. Gadkari

Mr. Mateen Shaikh i/b Sharif Shaikh with Afroz Siddiqui, Chirag Shah, Jammu Shaikh and Abhishek Ramde for Appellant. Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for Respondent-State.

Salman Sufiyan Shaikh

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for kidnapping under Section 363 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside conviction and sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the Sessions Court for kidnapping a minor child.

Previous Decisions

The Sessions Court convicted the appellant under Section 363 IPC and acquitted him under Sections 364-A and 342 IPC.

Issues

Whether the prosecution proved the offence of kidnapping under Section 363 IPC beyond reasonable doubt. Whether the consent of the child's mother was validly given.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the child's mother had consented to the taking. Prosecution argued that the child was taken without consent of the lawful guardian.

Ratio Decidendi

Taking a minor child without the consent of the lawful guardian constitutes kidnapping under Section 363 IPC. The defense of consent by the mother was not proved.

Judgment Excerpts

The present appeal has been filed by the appellant against the Judgment and Order dated 25 July 2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Borivali Division, Dindoshi, Mumbai in Sessions Case No.138 of 2011 arising out of C.R. No.148 of 2011 registered at Dindoshi Police Station, thereby convicting the appellant under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer R.I. for a period of 5 years and to pay fine of Rs.20,000/-.

Procedural History

The appellant was charged under Sections 363, 364-A, and 342 IPC. The Sessions Court acquitted him under Sections 364-A and 342 IPC but convicted him under Section 363 IPC. The appellant appealed to the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 363, 364-A, 342, 341, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Teacher's Petition Against Suspension Direction in School Tribunal Order. School Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction by Ordering Suspension Pending Enquiry; Management's Prerogative to Suspend Not Subject to Tribunal Direct...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping Under Section 363 IPC in Child Abduction Case. Court Confirms that Taking a Minor Without Consent of Guardian Constitutes Kidnapping, Rejecting Defense of Consent by Child's Mother.