Search Results for "quasi-judicial powers"

96 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 96 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Order Allowing Settlement Application. Settlement Commission's Finding of Full and True Disclosure of Income by Assessee in Case of Alleged Bogus Purchases Upheld Under Section 245D of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders passed by the Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Withdrawal of College Affiliation for Non-Compliance with University Norms. Petitioner's College Failed to Meet Minimum Standards Despite Repeated Opportunities, and Allegations of Vendetta Were Unsubstantiated.

The petitioner, Sanjeevan Gramin Vaidyakiya & Samajik Sahayata Pratishthan, a registered public trust and society, runs an Arts, Commerce and Science ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Cricket Association Against Injunction Restraining Expulsion of Member. Expulsion Decision Violated Natural Justice as No Opportunity of Hearing Was Given Before Imposing Five-Year Ban.

The case involves an appeal by the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA) against an order dated 7 September 2013 passed by the City Civil Court, Greater Mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Premature Retirement of Deputy Director of Health Services. The court upheld the constitutional validity of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and found the premature retirement order valid based on adverse entries and public interest.

The petitioner, Dr. Mrs. Pratibha Gulhane, a retired Deputy Director of Health Services, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Const...