Search Results for "protected tenant"

466 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 466 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Eviction of Licensee in Landmark Tenancy Case. Interpretation of Section 15A of the Bombay Rent Act Clarified: Shared Licenses Do Not Confer Tenancy Rights.

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Petitioners, legal heir of the original defendant, confirming the eviction order passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition in Land Possession Dispute Under Section 33B of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Landlords' Certificate of Exemption Under Section 88C Upheld, Personal Cultivation Need Established.

The case involves a dispute between the petitioners, who are the heirs of the original tenant Kondiba Dnyanu Dongale, and the respondents, who are the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partnership Act Bar Case — Agreement Held as Licence Not Lease. Suit for Eviction by Unregistered Partnership Firm Not Barred Under Section 69(2) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 as Right to Evict Trespasser Arises from Common Law.

The case involves a second appeal filed by M/s Hotel Satkar, an unregistered partnership firm, against the dismissal of their suit for eviction of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlady's Suit for Possession in Rent Control Case — Limitation Governed by Article 67 of Limitation Act, 1963. Suit Filed Within 12 Years from Termination of Tenancy by Notice is Maintainable.

The case involves a dispute between a landlady (since deceased, represented by heirs) and a tenant (since deceased, represented by heirs) regarding po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent findings of fact by trial and appellate courts cannot be interfered with under Article 227 unless perverse or without jurisdiction.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original defendant Shankar Mahada Kardile, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...