Search Results for "proprietor's wife"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "proprietor's wife"

223 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 223 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Civil Dispute Over Land Transaction — No Cognizable Offence Made Out. Transfer of Rs.1 Crore for Property Purchase in Rajasthan Treated as Civil Matter; FIR Registered in Arunachal Pradesh Lacked Territorial Jurisdiction and Criminal Intent.

29 Apr 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard two sets of appeals arising from the same First Information Report (FIR) No. 227 of 2017 registered at Police Station...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Review Order in Partition Suit — Held That High Court Erred in Reviewing Its Own Judgment Without Jurisdiction Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

8 Apr 2024

The appellant (plaintiff) filed a suit for partition and separate possession of suit properties, including houses and agricultural lands, against the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Charge Under Section 467 IPC in CBI Case — No Prima Facie Evidence of Forgery. Court held that mere fabrication of accounts without evidence of creating false document with intent to cause damage does not attract Section 467 IPC.

27 Feb 2024

The petitioners, Mr. Nikhil Girish Patt, Mr. Ilesh Shah, and Mr. Sooraj Kumar Tayade, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Charge Under Section 467 IPC Against Accused in CBI Case — No Prima Facie Evidence of Forgery for the Purpose of Cheating. The court held that a letter of credit is not a valuable security under Section 467 IPC and that the chargesheet lacked material to support the additional charge.

27 Feb 2024

The petitioners, Nikhil Girish Patt, Ilesh Shah, and Sooraj Kumar Tayade, were accused in a CBI case registered as RC No.02/E/2013-Mumbai under variou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defreezing of Bank Accounts in Cheque-Bouncing Case — No Prima Facie Case for Freezing Under Section 102 CrPC. Court held that freezing of accounts under Section 102 CrPC is not permissible for investigation of cheque-bouncing offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the offence is non-cognizable and the bank is not a third party.

30 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Manish Khandelwal, Sunil Khandelwal, and B.M. Financial Services (I) Pvt. Ltd., filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Abduction and Assault in Saravana Bhavan Case — Delay in FIR Condoned Due to Influence and Surveillance by Accused. The court affirmed that the prosecution proved the offence under Section 365 IPC based on credible victim testimony, despite delay in lodging FIR.

29 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by the accused, upholding their conviction under Sections 365 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code for the abduction a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Criminal Conspiracy and Assault Case — Conviction of Appellant No.1 for Obscene Acts and Extortion Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence, While Conviction for House Trespass and Wrongful Confinement Upheld for All Appellants. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove criminal conspiracy under Section 120B IPC and that the convictions under Sections 292, 385, and 355 IPC were not sustainable for appellant no.1.

14 Jul 2015

The appellants, Raju @ Ajit Sarfraj Tadvi, Shantaram Manil Sonawane, and Dhanraj Parashuram Chaudhari, were prosecuted for various offences under the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint and Impleadment of Parties in Property Dispute — Amendment Sought Before Commencement of Trial Allowed as No Prejudice Caused. Order VI Rule 17 CPC permits liberal amendment before trial; impleadment under Order I Rule 10 CPC allowed for complete adjudication.

1 Aug 2014

The plaintiffs, Sharayu Ramkrishna Mhatre and Anjali Deepak Karnik, filed a suit (Suit No. 1964 of 2012) in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaratio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Injunction Set Aside Due to Vague Pleadings and Lack of Prima Facie Case. The court held that without proper proof of trademark ownership and clear pleadings, an interim injunction cannot be granted under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

21 Sep 2013

The case involves an appeal against an interim injunction granted by the Principal District Judge, Pune, restraining the appellants from using the tra...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)