Search Results for "proposed accused"

1366 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1366 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sakharam Sitaram Bhise, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli in Sessions Trial Case No. 72/2010 for offences punisha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Acquits Accused in Part, Accepts State's Concession That Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act Not Attracted. Conviction Under Sections 366A and 302 IPC Under Scrutiny, Based on Last Seen Theory and Circumstantial Evidence.

The Karnataka High Court heard a criminal appeal preferred by the accused against his conviction by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Shim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal of Convicted Husband for Murder of Wife Under Section 302 IPC. Appellant Challenges Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Testimony of Interested Witnesses.

The appellant, Syed Sahil @ Krishnamurthy, was convicted by the Trial Court for the murder of his wife, Seema Thasleem, under Section 302 IPC. The cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Janardhan Ramaji @ Ramrao Bannagare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Case No. 116/2011 for the murde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Seven Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Objection Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC set aside as evidence failed to establish membership of unlawful assembly or common object to commit murder.

The case involves seven appeals filed by Ganpat Bapu Salunkhe, Shahaji Vasant Patil, Vinodsingh Shamsingh Rawat, Chandrakant Dhodiba Tikone, Appa Suba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vikas Baburao Marathe, a Talathi (revenue officer), was convicted by the Special Judge, Jalgaon, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Conviction Based on Sufficient Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe, Despite Hostile Witnesses, Upholds Trial Court Verdict.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, a Junior Training Officer in a Government ITI College, Saundatti, for demanding and accepting a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Manoj @ Manya Pandurang Kadam, Pranay @ Pintya Ramesh Pawar, and Pradeep @ Dadya Atmaram Pawar, were convicted by the Additional Sessi...