Search Results for "professional privilege"

77 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 77 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Injured Motorcyclist in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal's Award of Rs.10,44,212/- Modified to Rs.25,00,000/- with 9% Interest. Future Loss of Income Recalculated Based on Notional Income of Rs.4,500/- per Month and 40% Disability.

The appellant, Ambala Muljibhai Makwana (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), was driving a motor cycle on 18.01.2003 when a tanker bearing re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Inapplicability of S. Nithya Judgments to Cricket Associations in Membership and Election Dispute. Tiruchirappalli District Cricket Association Appeals Against Madras High Court's Application of Athletics Governance Reforms to Cricket Association

The Supreme Court heard appeals from the Appellant against the Madras High Court's judgment that applied directions from S. Nithya cases to the cricke...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Initiates Suo Moto Contempt for Scandalous Allegations Against High Court Judge. Unconditional Apology Accepted, Contempt Proceedings Closed.

The Supreme Court initiated suo moto contempt proceedings against N. Peddi Raju (alleged contemnor no.1), Ritesh Patil (alleged contemnor no.2), and N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Money Suit — Service of Summons Valid Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. The court held that the defendant had knowledge of the suit and failed to show sufficient cause for non-appearance, upholding the ex parte decree.

The appellant, M/s. CliniRX Research Pvt. Ltd., was the original defendant in a money suit filed by the respondent, Bicare Limited, for recovery of mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Defamation Proceedings Against Advocates for Drafting Pleadings as per Client Instructions — Lawyers Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 500 IPC for Statements Made in Written Statement on Behalf of Clients.

The petitioners, Manoharrao Gangakishan Arlikar and Manoj Manoharrao Arlikar, both advocates, challenged an order dated 20 June 2006 passed by the Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Cricketer in BCCI Match-Fixing Case for Violation of Natural Justice. Suspension Order Passed Without Show-Cause Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Set Aside as Arbitrary and Unreasonable.

The petitioner, Hiken Naresh Shah, a professional cricketer, challenged his suspension order dated 12th July 2015 passed by the President of the Board...