Search Results for "prior knowledge"

5477 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5477 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Conviction Set Aside Due to Gaps in Chain of Circumstances. Failure to Prove Motive and Last Seen Theory Beyond Reasonable Doubt Leads to Benefit of Doubt Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 302, 201, 120B.

The appellant, Vrishal Madhukar Kalane, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302, 201, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim exclusive possession of joint family property without partition and that a suit for possession without seeking partition is not maintainable.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a civil suit for possession filed by the original plaintiffs (now appellants) against the defendants...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Death Sentence in Confirmation Case for Kidnap, Rape and Murder of 5-Year-Old Girl — Circumstantial Evidence Proved Guilt. Conviction Under IPC Sections 302, 363, 376(2)(f), and 201 Based on Last Seen, Preparation, and Medical Evidence Held Unassailable.

The case arose from the kidnap, rape, and murder of a five-year-old girl, Chakuli, in Nerli village, Kolhapur district, on the night of 24 October 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mohd. Ismail Abdul Hadis Maniyar, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of a woman under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to lif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decrees Ownership of 800 ITC Shares to Plaintiffs, Finding Transfers Forged and Broker's Claim Unproven. Defendant No.14 Failed to Discharge Burden Under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and Forged Transfer Deeds Are Void; Register of Members Ordered to Be Rectified.

The suit concerned a declaration of ownership and rectification of the register of members of ITC Ltd. (Defendant No.1) in respect of 800 shares. Plai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Concurrent Findings on Declaration and Possession. Court holds that the First Appellate Court failed to frame proper points for determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, rendering its judgment unsustainable.

The appellant, Sri Gundappa, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the judgment and decree da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reserves Judgment in Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Disappearance of Evidence. Accused Challenges Reliability of Circumstantial Evidence Including Test Identification Parade and Recovery Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 08.12.2020 passed by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 179/2014, convicting ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Mayur Mulji Parmar and Bharat Mulji Parmar, were convicted by the Sessions Court, Mumbai, for the murder of an unknown woman and for c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaint in Copyright Infringement Suit for Lack of Cause of Action and Abuse of Process. Plaintiff failed to identify any protectable work or substantial similarity with defendant's film, leading to dismissal with costs.

The plaintiff, Akashaditya Harishchandra Lama, filed a suit for copyright infringement seeking an interim injunction to restrain the release of the fi...