Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

417 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 417 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Cancellation of CL-2 Liquor License for Violation of Distance Norms Under Karnataka Excise Act, 1965. License Granted in Contravention of Rule 8(2) of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968 Set Aside.

The case involves two writ appeals arising from a common order dated 07.09.2022 passed by a learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.50353/2019. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Excise Licenses for Stock Discrepancy and Rule Violations. Petitioner Failed to Maintain Proper Records and Appointed Manager Without Intimation, Violating Goa, Daman and Diu Excise Duty Rules, 1964.

The Petitioner, Manjuben Mukesh Tandel, proprietor of Infinity Traders, held two excise licenses for wholesale sale of Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMF...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Classifies Car Matting as Carpet Under Chapter 57 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. HSN Explanatory Notes and Specific Description Principle Applied to Hold That Car Matting Is More Specifically Described as Carpet Than as Motor Vehicle Accessory.

The case involved two appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III against a common decision of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Trader's Liability for Excise Duty on Job Work Fabrics Under Rule 12B of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Court Held That the Trader Who Gets Fabrics Manufactured Through Job Workers Is Deemed Manufacturer and Liable for Duty, Not the Job Worker.

The case involves appeals by Dinesh Textiles, a trader who got cotton fabrics and made-ups manufactured through job workers, against the order of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Order Upheld. Penalty under Rule 209A of Central Excise Rules, 1944 set aside for lack of evidence of aiding and abetting.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai, against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal of Commissioner of Central Excise in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Erred in Holding No Provision for Penalty Under Central Excise Act or Rules. Rule 209 of Central Excise Rules, 1944 Provides for Penalty for Offences Relating to Excisable Goods.

The Commissioner of Central Excise filed an appeal against the order dated 31st March 2005 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Levy of Excise Duty on Fabrication and Construction of Structurals - Activities Do Not Amount to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Fabrication at site results in immovable property, not excisable goods.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by M/s Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. and Ceat Tyres of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal on Excise Duty Exemption for Cotton Fabrics Produced by Cooperative Society. Interpretation of Exemption Notifications under Rule 8 of Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 at Issue.

The appellant, a textile dealer in Bombay, entered into an agreement with a registered cooperative society for weaving cotton fabrics on powerlooms ow...