Search Results for "patent illegality"

1383 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1383 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Valuation Based on Book Value as Per Partnership Deed. Clause-11 of Partnership Deed Mandates Asset Valuation on Book Value Basis, Not Market Value, Under Section 48 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

The case involves two appeals filed by Dr. Vijaypat Singhania and others (Appeal No. 361 of 2010) and Dr. Gaur Hari Singhania and others (Appeal No. 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Lease Finance Dispute — Depreciation Disallowance and Penalty Recoverable Under Contract. Arbitrator's interpretation of lease clauses upheld as plausible; no interference under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Aditya Birla Chemicals (I) Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages, rejecting grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

The petitioners, Pradyuman Kumar Sharma and Kuber Planters Limited, filed four arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Petition in Arbitration Dispute Over Bridge Construction. Arbitral Award Upheld as Not Contrary to Public Policy Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (owner), entered into a contract with the respondent, M/s. Oriental Construction Company Limited (co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute — Petitioner's Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Breach and Quantum Were Not Patently Illegal or Against Public Policy.

The petitioner, M/s Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Arbitral Award Rejecting Claim Over Stilt Parking Spaces. Court upholds arbitrator's interpretation that development agreement did not grant developer right to sell stilt car parking lots.

The petitioner, M/s. M. Mamotra Associates, a developer, entered into a Development Agreement dated 20 February 2006 with the respondent, Leela Raj 'A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Television Serial Production Dispute. Arbitrator's Findings on Breach of Contract and Quantum of Damages Upheld Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Charter Party Dispute Over Repair Costs. ONGC's challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 fails as arbitrator's interpretation of contract clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The case involves an appeal by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) against an order of a Single Judge dismissing its petition under Section 34...