Search Results for "medical practitioner"

688 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 688 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Termination of Pregnancy Beyond 20 Weeks Due to Severe Foetal Anomalies. Medical Board Confirms Substantial Risk of Serious Physical Handicap Under Section 3(2)(b) of Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

The petitioner, a woman in her 27th week of pregnancy, filed a writ petition seeking permission for medical termination of pregnancy. She had undergon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Termination of 23-Week Pregnancy Due to Fatal Cardiac Anomaly - Medical Board Opinion of Substantial Risk of Serious Handicap Justifies Abortion Under Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

The petitioners, a married couple, sought termination of the first petitioner's pregnancy of approximately 24 weeks (later determined as 23 weeks by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Medical Practitioners for Alleged Violations Under PCPNDT Act. Complaint Lacks Prima Facie Case of Sex Selection; Deficiencies in Form F Not Sufficient for Criminal Liability.

The criminal writ petition sought quashing of a complaint filed by the Appropriate Authority under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Medical Unfitness Declaration for Driver Post Due to Presternal Keloid Chest. Court holds that keloid is not a disqualifying condition for driving and directs BRO to reconsider petitioner's candidature.

The petitioner, Sayyad Naim Ali Kachruddin, applied for the post of Driver Mechanical Transport (Ordinary Grade) with the Border Roads Organisation (B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution Against Doctors in PCPNDT Act Case for Lack of Incriminating Material. The court held that the accusation was groundless under Section 245(2) CrPC, as no specific role was attributed to the applicants.

The applicants, Dr. Pratidnya Jayesh Shinde and Dr. Rahul Sudhirchandra Shinde, were accused nos. 2 and 3 in Regular Criminal Case No. 7 of 2012 pendi...