Search Results for "licensee area"

361 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 361 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Suspension of IOCL's Petroleum License Due to Lease Expiry. License Cancellation Not Warranted as Civil Suit for Eviction is Pending and No Immediate Danger to Public Safety Established.

The petitioner, Vijay Harinarayan Choudhary, is the owner of a plot in Nagpur which was leased to respondent No.1, Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to ISP in Section 9 Arbitration Application, Restraining OTT Platform from Suspending Internet Services to 22,000+ Subscribers. Court holds that MOU creates binding obligations and balance of convenience favors continuity of services pending arbitration.

The applicant, World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. (WPISPL), a Delhi-based Class A Unified License ISP, filed an application under Section 9 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Car Parking License Dispute. Clause 15 of License Agreement Permitted Change of Location Without Compensation, and No Evidence of Loss Was Found.

The petitioner, Garuda Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd., was granted a license by the Airport Authority of India (AAI) to operate a car parking facility at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Eviction Decree in Partnership Property Dispute. Concurrent findings of fact that defendants were licensees, not tenants, upheld under Article 227.

The petitioners (original defendants) were a partnership firm occupying premises owned by the respondent (original plaintiff) partnership firm. Initia...