Search Results for "leniency denied"

236 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 236 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Criminal Appeal in Disproportionate Assets Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Appellant Challenges Conviction Alleging Miscalculation of Income and Improper Sanction Under Sections 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, a former Electrical Attender in the Public Works Department, was convicted by the trial court under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Variance in Witness Testimony on Demand of Bribe Not Material, but Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Baburao Tayappa Mhetre (Respondent No.1) and Elahee Badshah Shaikh (Respondent No.2) by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, B.M. Venkatappa, a Second Division Assistant in the Office of the Director, Employees State Insurance, Bengaluru, was convicted by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Revocation of Letters of Administration in Succession Dispute — No Grounds for Revocation Under Section 263 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Concealment of Material Facts Not Established; Court Had Jurisdiction as Deceased's Fixed Place of Abode Was in Mumbai.

The petitioner, Kamal Prasad, filed a petition under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, seeking revocation of Letters of Administration g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Specific Performance Suit — Suit Dismissed as Barred by Limitation. Trial Court's Finding of Limitation Upheld; Decree for Refund Set Aside as Without Jurisdiction.

The dispute arose from an agreement to sell dated 01.09.2004 and a final agreement dated 19.11.2004 between the plaintiff (respondent) and the defenda...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Rajesh @ Venkatesha @ Raja @ Raju, was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu, Madikeri, in Sessions Case No.58/2006 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4, 6, 8, 12 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as victim's evidence was unreliable and medical evidence did not support sexual assault.

The appellant, Mahadeo @ Nana Gundiba Khandale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati in Special (POCSO) Case No.8/2015 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, P. Prakash, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Dharmapuri, under Section 6 of the Protection of Children fro...