WRIT PETITION NO.1940 OF 1999
23 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "layouts"
159 result(s) found
Found 159 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Despite Pending Civil Suit — Statutory Right to Conveyance Independent of Contractual Disputes. The Competent Authority's grant of deemed conveyance under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 was upheld as the statutory right operates independently of a pending civil suit for specific performance and damages.
7 Feb 2025The petitioner, Swastik Promoters and Developers, challenged an order dated 26th July 2021 passed by the Competent Authority (District Deputy Registra...
- 544
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Comprehensive Accessibility Compliance for Persons with Disabilities in Public Spaces - Emphasizes Social Model of Disability and Two-Pronged Approach to Accessibility. The Court reaffirmed accessibility as a fundamental right and directed amendment of Rule 15 of the RPWD Rules to align with Section 40 of the RPWD Act.
13 Dec 2024This judgment arises from a writ petition filed in 2005 by Rajive Raturi, a visually challenged person, seeking directions to ensure meaningful access...
- 899
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition in Amenity Space Computation Dispute — D.P. Road Area Must Be Adjusted Against Total Amenity Space Under DCR 57(4)(c)(ii). The court held that the Municipal Corporation's refusal to sanction plans based on a misinterpretation of DCR 57(4)(c)(ii) and Note II was arbitrary and unsustainable.
5 Sep 2023The petitioner, Atul Projects India Pvt Ltd, a developer, owned a plot of land in Mumbai and submitted development plans to the Municipal Corporation ...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order Under MOFA Due to Lack of Notice to Developer. Section 11 of MOFA Requires Notice to All Parties Before Granting Unilateral Conveyance.
5 Jun 2023The petitioners, M/s. ACME Enterprises (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Ummedra K. Vardhan, challenged an order dated 26th November 2019 passe...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Permission for Alteration of Open Spaces in Housing Project — Open Spaces Sanctioned in Approved Layout Cannot Be Reduced Under Guise of Surplus Area. The Court held that purchasers of plots have a right to the open spaces as shown in the approved layout, and any deviation requires fresh approval and consent of all affected parties.
30 Sep 2022The petitioners, residents and plot owners of the project 'Aldeia de Goa' at Bambolim, challenged the permission/NOC dated 11.12.2020 granted by the D...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Applicability of Affordable Housing Notification to Petitioners' Land. Clause 3 of Notification Dated 8th February 2016 Quashed as It Modified Development Control Regulations Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
23 Sep 2022The petitioners, Anwar Hussain J. Thim and M/s. Amit Builders, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay ...
- 90
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Landowners' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Unreliable Sale Exemplar and Upheld Development Charge Deductions. Compensation Reduced from Rs.70 per Square Feet to Rs.317 per Square Meter as Sale Instance Found Non-Bonafide and Large Area Acquisition Warranted Deductions Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
20 Sep 2021The appeals arose from a land acquisition dispute where the State of Maharashtra acquired land from landowners for public purposes. The land, comprisi...
- 291
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.
24 Aug 2020The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...
- 232
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Revenue Authorities in Stamp Duty Undervaluation Cases — Revisional Powers Under Section 47A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Upheld. The Court held that the limitation period for suo motu revision by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority is five years from the date of the order, not from the date of registration.
1 Jan 2020The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Madras High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 47A of...
- 336
