Search Results for "interim arbitral order"

780 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 780 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award of damages for short supply of coal, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Mahaguj Collieries Ltd. (original respondent) challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court of Bombay: Commercial Arbitration Appeal" "Exploring the scope of judicial review under Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, addressing readiness, willingness, and compensation issues in a shareholder dispute."

Arbitration Scope: The Court clarified the restrictive jurisdiction under Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing minim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Condonation of Delay in Filing Arbitration Challenge" "Justice Arif S. Doctor condones a 14-day delay in filing under Section 34, interpreting procedural requirements for signed arbitral awards in light of mandatory statute compliance."

1. Introduction and Parties The case involves the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) as the petitioner and Mumbai Metro One Pvt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Development Dispute. Court Upholds Damages for Breach but Disallows Compound Interest.

The judgment arises from two arbitration appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common order dated 25th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Between State of Maharashtra and Developer. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Clause and Failure of Respondent to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Appointment Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The State of Maharashtra filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to reso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute Case — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal of Interim Injunction. Court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for restraining the pledge of shares, as the shares were not proved to be held in a fiduciary capacity.

The case involves a dispute between two branches of the Arya family over shares of Arya Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. The appellants, Ravi Arya and other...